Vieux couple
Married life is the best way to make old bones! Conversely, being single increases mortality! So says a major survey of the INSEE. What are the health benefits of this marriage? Overview.
The exception of bachelors
There are also people who have never lived with a partner. About 8% of men and women between 40 and 90 years have never experienced life together. This occurs mostly in men over the bottom of the social scale …. and women at the top! For these soloists always, there is also a greater risk of mortality. But with age, being a confirmed bachelor finally play in their favor: after 80 years old girls and old boys have a lower risk of death than people in couples.
New singles: Beware!
INSEE found that becoming single is a particularly risky.It’s like a shock wave due to the passage of married life to single life, whether widowhood or separation. Again, this impact particularly affects men. Only remedy for these unstoppable new single: Recovering couple as soon as possible! Indeed, the risk of mortality disappears instantly when the couple‘s life again. But easier said than done! For men, this poses relatively little problem: they recover faster as a couple, and often with younger women. But for new singles, it seems more difficult to find a spouse.
Two is better!
INSEE was interested in men and women over 40 years to correlate their family situation and their risk of death. The conclusion is clear: all ages, mortality is higher among people who do not live as a couple. The critical period is between 40 and 50: the mortality rate is now two to three times higher among the unmarried.Then it becomes less and less true the more we advance in age. Men are most affected, with a very marked excess mortality among those living alone, and persists throughout life.
Two children, an ideal?
Married life is not the only way to protect his health: he must also have children! But beware, the number is important. By observing the curve of mortality risk, INSEE comes to the ideal figure of two children in the home: no children or only one exposed to a little more risk, and three or more equally. The explanation is essentially biological in women: those without children may pre-existing health problems, and conversely, many pregnancies fragile health. But this explanation does not apply in men, among whom the number of child protective is also two. This could be related in this case at least of risk behaviors and better social integration.
Celibacy Forum and Business Forum in solo life of couples
Generally, the more the couple is older, more desire diminishes. And here we are lamenting the shrinking what has become of our sexuality and regretting the passion starts. And that is precisely the trap in comparison with the past. Admittedly, it is perhaps less than before love, attention and surprises are perhaps more rare. But rather than whine, why not take stock of positive values? It was long to establish intimacy in love! Today, we know each other better, it has tamed his own body and that of another. We learned to let go, to surrender, all to be confident. And the habit may be good. ‘If it was discovered how to achieve the pleasure before, we know how to be sure. A habit is good as it does not become a constraint. This applies to the sex life like the rest, ‘Catherine Cudicio analysis.
Sustaining the desire is to accept that it could take a new look with time.’We must stop confusing great sex with sexual performance. Desire can evolve into tenderness, complicity, an erotic atmosphere, but not necessarily and purely sexual. It also means accepting that one’s body can change. Over time, we often tend to conceal her body under the other. To hide a less firm skin, the marks of time … ‘When the body ages, sexual desire may be more difficult to achieve physically, but that does not mean it has disappeared, says the analyst. On the other hand, a couple that remains stable over time is also a couple who has built his plan beyond his sexuality. ‘